One of the primary arguments against micro-housing is that the limited space is equal to low-quality housing. Opponents often compare aPodment residents to sardines crammed inside a tin.

This is a specious argument. It is not up to the opponents of micro-housing to decide if aPodment residents would be happier living in larger rooms. Many of the current and potential aPodment residents are happy with a smaller space if it means cheaper rent, fewer roommates, easy access to transit, more neighborhood services, a safer environment, and better household amenities.

When opponents voice concern over room size, they betray an interest only in their own preferred style of living and a limited understanding of the interests of aPodment residents. These opponents of micro-housing are fortunate enough to live in a city that contains the housing choices they prefer. Let’s improve the city by further allowing the choices micro-housing residents prefer, rather than eliminating those choices.

Support Us

Let’s Make #Homes4WA

Washington faces a very deep housing availability and affordability crisis that has only worsened in the past several years. It’s time for Washington to face this crisis head on. It’s time to take action to house Washington. Let your legislators know we need their help to house everyone.

Article Author

Owen does servicing and consulting for a software company to pay the bills. He has an amateur interest in urban policy, focusing on housing. His primary mode is a bicycle but isn't ashamed of riding down the hill and taking the bus back up. Feel free to tweet at him: @pickovven.