Last week, we reported on Community Transit’s future plans for Swift II, a new bus rapid transit line in Snohomish County that would connect Canyon Park (Bothell) to Paine Field (Boeing-Everett). The pieces are quickly falling into place for the project with newly granted approval by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to proceed with project development. This is an important step because it means that the project could qualify for the coveted and valuable New Starts grant program. Earlier this year, the agency received a $3.3 million dollar grant from the FTA to proceed with design and environmental analysis on the line.

Community Transit has a lot of work left:

  • The County and State need to develop a plan to improve capacity and speeds along 128th Street at I-5;
  • Small Starts grants must be secured in order to deploy new buses and stations;
  • State taxing authority is required to operate Swift II service; and
  • The agency must work with local jurisdictions to upgrade infrastructure along the proposed routed.

Working with local and state agencies are manageable issues for the agency. New taxing authority would come through a local options sales tax that the Governor proposed last week. It is unknown if such a proposal will be successful in the 2015 Legislature. Meanwhile, if the application by Community Transit rates high enough, it could qualify for the New Starts funding in the next two years. The agency believes that the soonest deployment of Swift II service could be early 2018.

Besides new stations, buses, and high frequency service, a key element for the deployment of Swift II is the construction of Seaway Transit Center as the line’s northern terminus. This facility would be located on property currently owned by Boeing at the Everett plant. The approximate location is expected to be around Boeing Access Road and Gate E-77, just west of Seaway Boulevard. Boeing already funds a custom route by King County Metro Transit designated as Route 958, which loops around the campus and serves Gate E-77. Adding a transit center here is a logical decision. Boeing has a very high volume of employees that come and go from the plant 24 hours a day. Ridership is already built in. But this location also has a benefit for residents and commuters. The new transit center would provide a connection point for many local Community Transit and Everett Transit routes as well.

Earlier this month, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) picked the Seaway Transit Center as a candidate for their Regional Mobility Grant Recommend Project List. If funding becomes available, WSDOT could award up to $6.8 million to Community Transit. The grant would allow Community Transit to both assemble land and design the transit center. It is anticipated that funding could roll in over the next four years.

In a press release by Community Transit, US Senator Patty Murray (D-Washington) was quoted as saying:

This approval from the Federal Transit Administration is an exciting and important next step toward making Swift II a reality. Snohomish County commuters, businesses and families have already seen the benefits of the first Swift line, and I will continue working with Community Transit and federal transportation officials to move this project forward.

Murray has done a lot for local transit thanks to her power as Chair of the Senate Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee. In the past decade, she has delivered more than $1 billion towards new capital transit projects like Link Light Rail, Seattle-Portland high speed rail, Swift, and RapidRide to name a few. While her position in Senate will be changing come January due in part to the Republican takeover, we hope that she will continue on the Subcommittee as Ranking Member. Her presence is invaluable to delivering key transit funding to projects in Washington like Swift II.

 

Feature image credited to Atomic Taco on Flickr.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider supporting our work. The Urbanist is a non-profit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Previous articleThe Alaskan Way Viaduct Must Come Down, Not Be Converted Into a Park, Part 2
Next articleChristmas Eve
Stephen is an urban planner with a passion for promoting sustainable, livable, and diverse cities. He advocates for smart policies, regulations, and implementation programs that enhance urban environments by committing to quality design, accommodating growth, providing a diversity of housing choices, and adequately providing public services. Stephen primarily writes about land use and transportation issues.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Probably also important to mention the following things about existing service in the areas covered by Swift II:

    – Service to Boeing for workers is also provided by a few Community Transit and Everett Transit routes (I don’t know if there’s a funding arrangement), with schedules similar to the 958.

    – Regular service between Canyon Park, Mill Creek, and Mariner P&R is provided by CT #105; whereas Swift II would extend beyond Mariner P&R to Boeing, the 105 extends beyond Canyon Park to Bothell.

    – Connections to other major transit routes would include: ST #532, #535 at Canyon Park, CT #101 at Mariner, Swift at 99/Airport Rd.

    Now, to take off my fact-reporting hat and put on my editorial hat:

    – Where’s the part about making the stations and especially the connections with other major transit routes places that you’d want to be on foot… or even that you’d plausibly be on foot even if you don’t necessarily want to be? Canyon Park, for example, describes a pretty big area that’s not super pedestrian-friendly, and even including parts that are a good 20 minutes’ walk or more from the P&R it’s not exactly an overwhelming concentration of businesses (I used to work there so I have a pretty good idea of this). And that’s supposed to be the line’s southern anchor and 3rd biggest destination? So much of this line runs on highways, not even strip mall-lined “stroads” like 99 but highways with lots of empty space between destinations.

    And to wear both hats at the same time:

    – Just-missed connections to other major transit routes would include: ST #512 at South Everett, ST #522 and KCM #372 and #238 in Bothell (if the CT #101 is major the KCM #238 is major, too — if not, then strike the #101 from the point above).

    • There’s also the 800 series and 410 at Mariner. I think it would be ideal to extend Swift II to UW-Bothell for just the reason of ridership. Ending at Canyon Park probably isn’t the best terminus for the line. In the previous article, I did discussed the routing of Airport in the comments. I have mixed feelings on it myself, especially in light of where future LRT may or may not go.

      As for CT routes, good point: the 227, 247, and 277 serve the perimeter of the Boeing site. I suppose I excluded them since they don’t operate to Gate E-77 where the new TC is likely.

Comments are closed.