Examining urban policy to improve cities and quality of life.

  • Features
    • Spatial Planning
      • Architecture
      • Land Use & Development
      • Parks & Public Space
      • Plans & Policy
    • Transportation
      • Cycling
      • Driving
      • Transit
      • Walking
    • Economics & Politics
      • Economics
      • Housing
      • Politics & Government
      • Social Welfare
    • Culture & Innovation
      • Civics & Culture
      • Education
      • Environment & Sustainability
      • Technology
  • Calendar
  • About
    • Organization Profile
    • Policy Principles
    • Organization Staff
    • Elections Board
    • Guest Contributors
    • Comment Policy
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
  • Write For Us
HALA/Housing/Land Use & Development

Councilmember Juarez Seeks To Freeze Heavy Commercial Development in Aurora-Licton Springs

by Stephen Fesler @safesler on September 25, 2017

Councilmember Debora Juarez intends to introduce legislation today that would encourage more housing and pedestrian-oriented urban development in the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village. The proposed legislation would achieve this by putting a temporary moratorium in place for up to one year for certain uses. This would give policymakers time to complete the citywide Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) process, which is successively rezoning urban districts across the city. Residential and most pedestrian-oriented non-residential uses would continue to be allowed throughout the targeted moratorium.

The proposed legislation would only affect commercial zones in the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village. Specifically, the legislation would prohibit heavy commercial, manufacturing, and warehouse uses in the Commercial 1 (C1), Commercial 2 (C2), and Neighborhood Commercial 3 zones that line much of the urban village.

Existing zoning in the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village and pending development applications. (City of Seattle)

The moratorium would mean that uses like drive-in businesses, outdoor storage, general manufacturing, recycling and solid waste uses, warehousing, vehicle sales and rental, mini-storage, wholesale showrooms, standalone long-term parking, and towing services would not be allowed. Councilmember Juarez fears that continuing to allow these types of uses would mean less future development capacity in the urban village and greatly affect pedestrian-oriented urban development. A lot of those types of uses continue to be developed in the urban village according to permitting data, which adds credence to the concern.

Advertisement

The draft MHA rezones for the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village would generally change C1 and C2 to a Neighborhood Commercial zoning type. Some of this would be paired with Pedestrian zone designation placing further controls on the types of activities allowed to encourage denser pedestrian-oriented development. Councilmember Juarez reports that many people in the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village area support rezoning the district and are welcoming to more pedestrian-oriented development.

Alternative 2 MHA rezone for Aurora-Licton Springs. (City of Seattle)
Alternative 2 MHA rezones for the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village. (City of Seattle)
Alternative 3 MHA rezone for Aurora-Licton Springs. (City of Seattle)
Alternative 3 MHA rezones for the Aurora-Licton Springs Urban Village. (City of Seattle)

Councilmember Juarez hopes that the emergency legislation will be adopted by the City Council by October 2nd. Under state law, a public hearing must be held on any temporary moratorium within 60 days of its adoption to affirm continuance of it. Projects that are already vested under existing land use laws may continue to be processed and approved under those laws despite the moratorium. So the proposed legislation would not stop those projects from going forward, but it would affect any other development proposals after its adoption.

Title image courtesy of Google Maps.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider supporting our work. The Urbanist is a nonprofit that depends on donations from people like you.

View this document on Scribd
Facebook Twitter Tumblr Reddit Email 5
Previous Post

Sunday Video: LGBTQ-Affirming Affordable Senior Housing in Seattle

Next Post

Urbanist Tours: South Lake Union Boom Recap

Stephen Fesler

Stephen is an urban planner with a passion for promoting sustainable, livable, and diverse cities. He advocates for smart policies, regulations, and implementation programs that enhance urban environments by committing to quality design, accommodating growth, providing a diversity of housing choices, and adequately providing public services. Stephen primarily writes about land use and transportation issues.

  • zbreeze

    “uses like drive-in businesses, outdoor storage, general manufacturing, recycling and solid waste uses, warehousing, vehicle sales and rental, mini-storage, wholesale showrooms, standalone long-term parking, and towing services would not be allowed”

    Where should those things be, then? Some of them are car-centric, and I imagine that some folks envision a world without cars, or at least far fewer cars, where vehicle sales/rental, standalone long-term parking, and towing services won’t be needed in the same numbers. But, what about storage, recycling/waste, manufacturing?

    • Andre Tsang

      Kent?

      • Mike Carr

        Aurora?

    • Amy LaZerte

      There’s already a self storage place on Aurora in the fifth district, two transfer stations (Recycling/Waste) within a few miles (Wallingford down south, Shoreline up north), PLENTY of used car lots and drive throughs and a fair amount of warehouse space. Don’t worry, North Seattle’s already got that type of use covered, now we’re just looking to keep some space open for the other type of businesses we’d like to have close to home.

    • Glen Buhlmann

      It’s in the urban village. Urban villages are intended to be dense neighborhoods and those business types prevent dense neighborhoods from being created. This does not apply to all of Aurora.

Donate

The Urbanist is a 501(c)4 nonprofit. We largely depend on donations to handle our ongoing costs. Monthly donations are greatly apprecated from regular readers.

Search

Advertisement

Connect

Random 5

  • 1

    Rents In San Francisco Are Determined By Demand, New Data Show

  • 2

    ST3 Sidewalk Chalk Inflames The Seattle Times

  • 3

    What We're Reading: University Link Opens!

  • 4

    The Seattle Times Transit Hypocrisy: Pronto Versus Park And Rides

  • 5

    The Parsonage: Preserving History and Adding Housing Options in the U District

Comments

  • Mike Carr on Aurora Avenue: Can a Lost Opportunity Be Regained?
  • mike eliason on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • Donn on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • Doug Trumm on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • LukasMaps on A Better Transit Hub for People: Union Station Should See Trains Once Again

Twitter

Follow @urbanistorg

The Urbanist
@urbanistorg

  • NEW: Aurora Avenue: Can a Lost Opportunity Be Regained? https://t.co/8wOxDzelXC
    about 2 hours ago
  • Well hopefully buses aren't so slow as to discourage use, too. #PedestrianizeTheAve #BanTheCars #TransitMall… https://t.co/v1X4huZPc6
    about 13 hours ago
  • Sound Transit Unveils West Seattle and Ballard Alternatives https://t.co/Bfiunc7IYV
    about 16 hours ago

Instagram

See More
Follow

The Urbanist was founded in early 2014 in order to examine and influence urban policies. We believe cities provide unique opportunities for addressing many of the most challenging social, environmental, and economic problems. We serve as a resource for promoting and disseminating ideas, creating community, increasing political participation, and improving the places we live.

Join us each month in Downtown Seattle for a social gathering to talk about urban issues and hear from local thought leaders.

When: Second Tuesday / 5.30pm - 7.30pm
Where: Elephant & Castle / 1415 Fifth Avenue, Seattle

Questions: info@theurbanist.org

Publication content licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 US.

Back to Top
sponsored