In this video, Dave Amos of City Beautiful speaks to a software designer about Cities: Skylines and its attempt to simulate real cities.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a non-profit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Previous articleHow We Do
Next articleSeattle Stagnated on Vision Zero in 2018, Preliminary Crash Data Shows
Stephen is an urban planner with a passion for promoting sustainable, livable, and diverse cities. He advocates for smart policies, regulations, and implementation programs that enhance urban environments by committing to quality design, accommodating growth, providing a diversity of housing choices, and adequately providing public services. Stephen primarily writes about land use and transportation issues.

1 COMMENT

  1. I love this game.

    That said, I find it’s a lot easier than the Sim City games, which were balanced so that you had to be a lot more careful with your money or your city will go bankrupt. Or if traffic got too bad, and people wouldn’t be able to get to work.

    I rarely have to make difficult decisions and tradeoffs in skylines. Subways are not that expensive to build to alleviate traffic, so I don’t really need the other transportation options. I can usually run the whole city on wind power, so I don’t need to carefully plan out my power options.

Comments are closed.