Findings strengthen case for funding work that could lead to lidding segments of the freeway.

In the event of an earthquake, do you know what Seattle roadway is named as the city’s seismic lifeline? If you guessed Interstate 5 (I-5) the freeway that cuts straight through the heart of Seattle, you’d be wrong. Instead its Interstate 405, which does not even run through Seattle, that has received the seismic lifeline designation from the Washington State of Transportation (WSDOT). As a closer alternative, SR 99 (Aurora Avenue) has been identified as a possibility, pending more analysis from the agency.

A map showing Center Puget Sound Highway Earthquake Risks, including liquefaction susceptibility and seismic lifeline status.
(Credit: Northwest Progressive Institute)

Why is the freeway that has bisected Seattle for over 60 years, the same one that carries thousands of vehicles daily, seen as unfit for emergency operations?

Heavy use, aging infrastructure, and deferred maintenance have degraded the condition of the freeway, WSDOT says. Throughout the entire state corridor, I-5 is need of repair, but in the Seattle segment of the freeway, WSDOT estimates that a $550 million investment is need to pay for seismic retrofits alone. The data was shared with the public in a 2019 Call to Action report emphasizing the freeway’s poor condition from the I-5 Systems Partnership, just before the partnership was dissolved for lack of funding.

Since then, little to no progress has been made to address the issue of I-5 confronting its obsolescence. WSDOT’s Revive I-5 freeway preservation program estimates the work will continue into the 2030s and that most of it remains unfunded.

“Preserving this highway is an enormous undertaking that grows each year as the weather and billions of tires take a toll on pavement that is nearing the end of its useful life,” the Revive I-5 website states.

To gauge the public’s response to the poor condition of the freeway, the Northwest Progressive Institute (NPI) commissioned a scientific poll gauging the public’s response on three questions related to the freeway’s condition.

Responses to the poll showed a high level of concern, with a strong majority of respondents indicating concern over its capability to withstand a major earthquake. The poll also found most respondents were open to relocating to Downtown freeway ramps if it were determined to be “feasible for improving traffic congestion and safety issues.”

Change Research conducted the poll in July to 617 Seattle voters and assessed its modeled margin of error of 4.3% at the 95% confidence interval.

The Urbanist’s former boardmember Scott Bonjukian is co-chair of the Lid I-5 campaign, a grassroots movement to reconnect Seattle neighborhoods divided by the freeway, and he welcomed the poll’s findings.

“Lid I-5 was interested in this information put out by NPI because we know that lidding I-5 is a complex endeavor that may necessitate changes to the underlying infrastructure. The polling shows that people are engaged on this issue, and importantly for Downtown, that they are willing to make changes to the ramps that could help make lidding the freeway easier,” Bonjukian said via email. “Elected officials should take this as a sign that their constituents care about the seismic safety of Interstate 5 and the configuration of the ramps, and that voters want a spotlight on these challenges.”

In 2020, the City of Seattle released a feasibility study demonstrating that it is possible to lid, or cap, a segment of I-5 in Downtown Seattle, a goal advocated for by the Lid I-5 campaign. Since then, Lid I-5 has continued to urge the City to explore options that advance the cause of lidding the freeway, in particular funding a Downtown Street Network Study.

A graphic shows current freeway conditions and what it might look like with a freeway lid.
A diagram showing a basic design for a freeway lid or cap. (Credit: Lid I-5)

A closer look at the NPI poll

In the first question, respondents were asked to review the seismic lifeline map shared above and then posed the following question:

The map below depicts the state of risk of major highways in our area to severe damage in a major earthquake. After reviewing the map, please indicate how concerned you are about the capability of Interstate 5 to survive a major earthquake in Seattle and be available for emergency use.

Northwest Progressive Institute

As mentioned previously, 82% of respondents were concerned, with 38% very concerned and 44% somewhat concerned. Only 13% indicated that they were not worried, 10% not worried, and 3% not worried at all. 5% responded that they were unsure.

The second question related to freeways ramps in Downtown Seattle and used the map below for support.

A map shows the stretch of I-5 in Downtown Seattle with entrance and exit ramps identified.
Credit: Northwest Progressive Institute

After reviewing the map, please specify whether you would support or oppose relocating some of the Interstate 5 ramps in downtown Seattle if this were determined to be feasible for improving traffic congestion and safety issues.

Northwest Progressive Institute

In response to this question, 77% of respondents were supportive with 43% stating strong support and 34% some support. 12% expressed disapproval, with the respondents evenly split between some opposition and strong opposition. 6% indicated they were unsure.

Soliciting public feedback

The third question in the poll was open-ended, allowing for respondents to share their individual thoughts and opinions, which were then grouped into three categories.

Should the state prioritize modernizing the stretch of Interstate 5 that runs through Seattle, from the northern city limit with Shoreline to the southern city limit with Tukwila?

Northwest Progressive Institute

After reviewing the written responses, it was determined that 40% of respondents wrote supportive answers, 30% did not express a clear stance or made other comments, 18% indicated opposition, 12% expressed ambivalence or said they didn’t know. NPI notes in its writeup on the poll’s results that many of those who wrote supportive answers “expressed a lot of enthusiasm.”

“I‑5 is in such bad shape and negatively dissects the city,” noted a respondent. “It needs to be redone to better serve travelers, reunite neighborhoods it now divides and be climate neutral.”

“Definitely need [I‑5 to be] more transit ready and earthquake safe,” wrote another respondent. “Single car driving should be discouraged and the city needs to greatly improve mass transit.”

A photo shows the almost complete new Washington State Convention center adjacent to I-5 in Downtown Seattle.
The stretch of I-5 near the new Washington State Convention Center in Downtown Seattle. (Photo by author)

In terms of near-term actions, the Lid I-5 campaign is calling on Seattle officials to fund a Downtown Network Study in the 2022 transportation budget. Such a study would provide valuable information on traffic patterns related to the existing freeway ramps which could aid in the development of alternatives that open the possibility of relocating, or removing, ramps. The Lid I-5 campaign is particularly interested in opportunities to remove the ramps at Spring Street and Seneca Street, which would “enhance opportunities for lid structures.”

To advance the cause of the Downtown Street Network Study, Lid I-5 is calling on supporters to email the Seattle City Council or reach out directly to their district councilmember and express their support for the study. Supporters can also testify at the upcoming budget hearings on November 10 and 18.

Note: Natalie Bicknell Argerious is a member of the Lid I-5 steering committee.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Natalie Bicknell Argerious (she/her) is Managing Editor at The Urbanist. A passionate urban explorer since childhood, she loves learning how to make cities more inclusive, vibrant, and environmentally resilient. You can often find her wandering around Seattle's Central District and Capitol Hill with her dogs and cat. Email her at natalie [at] theurbanist [dot] org.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jules James

What value is the lid? Can’t put housing on it. Can’t put office or retail on it. Might get a fantastic off-leash dog park. Might get a massive parking lot. I don’t understand why lid proponents ignore the basic reality: WashDoT will never — should never — allow a conflicting use with regional transportation to be built within this right-of-way.

Eric

Can’t put housing on it. Can’t put office or retail on it.

Whyever not? We already lidded part of I-5 with a convention center. Housing is just as important as a convention center, if not moreso.

Last edited 1 month ago by Eric
Blair

“Who’s worried about the condition of our infrastructure?”
“WE ARE! RAWWARRRR!”
“Who’s ready to pay to fix it?”
<crickets>

If we fail to adequately build for the future for long enough, the stuff our parents and grandparents built will just rot into the ground.

You get what you pay for, folks. And we’re getting what we’re paying for.

Tony Karais

Exactly.

Derek

I think a bored tunnel should be considered as well. Would be the most seismically stable and avoid the issue of building a lid altogether. Commuters can use surface streets when they get into the city.

billt47

Why “avoid the issue of building a lid”? You want to pay several times as much, in order to “avoid” reconnecting a part of downtown?

A Joy

What part of downtown is disconnected at present? While I am not opposed to a lid in principle, we have much more pressing issues than this throughout the city. Link, homelessness/housing, sidewalks in the north end… let’s get the problems solved first before looking fondly at the wish list.

tacomee

If you look at things that way, and fund all the run down infrastructure Seattle has ignored for the last 75 years…. there’s no money for anything else at this point. Generations of pols put their pet projects ahead of things like bridge maintenance for so long the whole City is basically falling apart.

But here’s what’s going to happen. The pols will continue to fund their pet projects and moan and wail that expenses like bridges, sidewalks and even homeless camps can’t be paid for because King Country or Washington State or the Federal Government didn’t give Seattle the money…

Tony Karais

What would a lid do? I’ll tell you, literally nothing.