Earlier this month, we reported on an attempt by transit advocates to improve connectivity with Capitol Hill’s new light rail station when service begins in March. At the beginning of the month, Metro quietly announced that it was scaling back the changes it had planned to make by keeping Route 11 on its current path, leaving the only change the conversion Route 43 to peak-only peak-direction service. This leaves a swath of the densest section of Capitol Hill with only the unreliable Route 8 as an east-west connector, while Routea 10, 11, and 49 continued to service Pine Street.

On Friday, King County Metro announced that after taking the temperature of riders on Capitol Hill, via a very brief public comment period and online survey, that it would make a change to the Route 10, routing the bus down E Olive Way instead of E Pine St. This change will do two things: allow riders on 15th Ave E a direct connection to light rail service, as opposed to forcing people transferring to walk from E Pine St to E Denny Way, and provides riders on E Olive Way with both a connection to the station if they need one and a direct connection to Downtown during off-peak times and weekends that will be going away without Route 43.

Route-10-potential-changes-map-20151204-png
The new route 10, as announced by Metro on Friday.

This change is not ideal, but it was supported by a majority of respondents. 45% of those who took the survey said they liked the change, but 19% said they didn’t like the change but could live with it. This is particularly remarkable, as those respondents could easily have selected the option that they don’t like it, full stop, and signals a willingness to accept changes that further mobility for other transit riders in the neighborhood.

Metro is likely to revisit the transit service network on Capitol Hill as light rail service begins, at or before the process of converting service on Madison Street into Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in 2019.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Ryan Packer lives in the Summit Slope neighborhood of Capitol Hill and has been writing for the blog since 2015. They report on multimodal transportation issues, #VisionZero, preservation, and local politics. They believe in using Seattle's history to help attain the vibrant, diverse city that we all wish to inhabit. In December 2020, Ryan started a three-month stint as editor of Seattle Bike Blog.

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rossb

Here are the numbers:

45% Like it
24% – I don’t like it
19% – I don’t like it, but could live with it
12% Have no opinion

Here is another way to summarize the numbers:
45% Like it
43% – Don’t like it
12% Have no opinion

The number of people who don’t like it is broken down into two categories. Those that don’t like it and those that don’t like it but could live with it. I wonder how many liked it but could live without it? My guess is roughly the same number.

Talk about push polling (or maybe push reporting) by Metro. Why have a separate category for disliking it, but not liking it? What if it turns out the numbers are actually like this:

15% Strongly favor
30% Slightly favor
19% – Slightly oppose it
24% – Strongly oppose it

We don’t know if that is true or not (of course). But we do know that about a quarter of the people say the don’t like it and can’t live with it. Another 19% don’t like it, but can live with it. I really don’t understand why they made this change, but to suggest that there was strong support by respondents is misleading.