A few years ago, Seattle ran an interesting experiment on radically densifying low rise neighborhoods with microhousing–a typology of small, minimal units that provide somewhat affordable rents as an alternative to expensive apartments or shared housing. They came in two varieties – Small Efficiency Dwelling Units (SEDUs), micro-sized studios; and Congregate Housing, housing with smaller areas for bathing and sleeping with shared kitchens and amenity spaces. They were sort of a market-rate play on the existenzminimum –and they induced a lot of consternation– from homeowners who resented an influx of people who couldn’t afford million dollar homes, to those who believe small apartments are inhumane. In response, the city passed legislation that severely curtailed the production of congregate housing. This was intriguing to me, because Congregate Housing was a bit of a cousin to the Clusterwohnung.

The Clusterwohnung, German for cluster apartment, is a hybrid between a small apartment and a shared residence. It’s a housing typology that isn’t common, but has seen a bit of an uptick in recent years on some high quality affordable housing projects in Germany and Switzerland. They’re supersized dwelling units with communal kitchen, living room, dining spaces – that are paired with smaller private units or rooms with their own bathrooms, and in some instances kitchenettes. The idea is that the common spaces of the house, which are generally some of the least utilized, are shared between more people. In addition, the cost of food, utilities, and household chores can be divvied up to reduce the financial burdens and time.

If this has you thinking of a housing or student coop –that’s because the clusterwohnung is rooted in cooperative and communal living. Many of these projects support alternative family models and lifestyles. And they’re components of larger multifamily buildings—this isn’t a variation of living in a single family house. Some of the cluster apartments are in buildings almost exclusively of other cluster apartments, some are a single cluster unit in a more typical multifamily building. There are also several flavors of cluster apartments, which can cater to a larger number of households. Some are also incredibly large, and have several dispersed common areas. Meals are often shared, but not required to be.

The scale of some of these are amazing –and they vary considerably, from a few households to a unit of 50. In some instances, clusterwohnungen are also used for disabled residents, and senior housing. They stand in stark contrast to the model of multifamily housing typical for shared residences –offering more private space, as well as a more communal sphere. You can start to see the games that can be played –How many families can you fit in one unit? What is the smallest, most affordable private space we could get away with, to ensure that the larger communal space is of a high quality and livable for all residents? How do we design units that accommodate both elderly and young residents, and affordably?

These concepts aren’t exactly new, though how they get marketed, designed, financed, and/or packaged may be. There are maaaaany models of collective housing that predate clusterwohnungen, but have been lost or forgotten over time. And ever present in the background of my mind, Moisei Ginzburg’s constructivist Dom Narkomfin, though the reality is that it’s deteriorating.

Co-existence. Shared costs. How can new development respond to the radical societal and demographic changes underway in urban centers? How can intergenerational living and accessibility be incorporated into larger community? What options do residents have where stereotypical development, studios or ‘family apartments’ – are not really a desired or affordable? Clusterwohnungen aren’t the answer to the housing question for everyone– but they seem to be an answer for an increasing number of households seeking community, privacy, and affordable housing where the housing market increasingly is unable to provide anything close to what they need. Perhaps we should think about incorporating some of these here…

A few built examples

The multifamily cooperative Kraftwerk2 by Adrian Streich Architekten is located on the outskirts of Zuerich, It includes a wide diversity of unit types ranging from studios to clusterwohnungen – of which there are several. The larger one is a six-unit CW 3,500 square feet unit where most units have a private bathroom and minikitchen. Some of the private units have multiple rooms. The common space, over a third of the unit’s area, includes a terrace, common dining and kitchen area, and several sitting areas. There’s a guest bathroom as well. (Pics here, plan here).

Another cooperative built by Kraftwerk1 featuring clusterwohnungen, is the Zwicky Sued, a brownfield redevelopment by Schneider Studer Primas in the suburbs of Zuerich. One version of an 11-unit CW– note that it has both a large kitchen, and a small teekuche (mini kitchen), and most of the restrooms are shared between units/guests. Another 11-bedroom floor plan can be seen here, with units sporting both shared and private restrooms, as well as several seating and dining areas – as well common roof deck.

Duplex Architekten’s Haus A at Mehr als Wohnen, a cooperative in the Hunziker Areal redevelopment in Zuerich, features a number of 5-unit CWs, with each unit having its own bathroom and mini-kitchen (partial plan here). Common space includes two generous outdoor terraces, kitchen and dining. There are several seating areas of various dimension, as well as a guest bathroom, storage and laundry room. (Plans and pics here.) The Hunziker Areal redevelopment is really something else, I’m not sure why this hasn’t picked up as a model for turning brownfields into neighborhoods – but it should be.

The Spreefeld cooperative in Berlin by Carpaneto, Fatkoehl, and BAR architekten is a really stunning project with incredible building amenities and a diversity of unit types. This is probably one of the most impressive self-developed projects I’ve ever seen — we would love to see housing options like this in Seattle. For a little more info, check out the Right to Build toolkit. (Video of an 11-person, eight-unit clusterwohnung here, cutaway axon of said unit here.)

Located in Munich, the WagnisArt cooperative designed by bogevischs buero is a really incredible and innovative project. Clusterwohnungen come in a variety of sizes on the project, and are roughly a third of floor area. There is a seven-unit version with one- to two-bedroom private units, with kitchen/living/dining/terrace and guest bath as common area. Another version features a four-unit clusterwohnung, each unit with its own bathroom and minikitchen. The common space are kitchen/dining, living, outdoor terrace, and guest bathroom. Lloyd Alter wrote about this award winning passivhaus project in March. (Project fotos here, four-unit clusterwohnung plan here.)

This is a cross-post from Mike Eliason’s blog on Medium.

Mass Timber Social Housing on Public Land FTW

Previous articleCity Council Landmarks Key Arena and Grants Greenwood Rezone
Next articleNathanbabble, III of III
Mike is a certified passivhaus designer, energy geek, and design nerd with an almost fetishistic interest in prefab wood buildings, low-energy architecture, social housing, and all things German. He has lived in Fremont for nearly a decade, and wants Seattle to become a greater version of Freiburg so his wife doesn’t force him to return to live in Vauban. He’s also begun the process of forming a baugruppe.

1 COMMENT

  1. Interesting idea I had not run across before. Such a residence would be quite interesting for a multi-generational household.

Comments are closed.