The Urbanist Stands in Support of Black Lives Matter

Protesters react with fists raised in solidarity as Nikkita Oliver takes the stage at City Hall on Wednesday June 3rd. (Photo by Doug Trumm)
Protesters react as Nikkita Oliver takes the stage at City Hall on Wednesday June 3rd. (Photo by author)

George Floyd’s murder was the tip of the iceberg when it comes to police murders. Despite efforts by Mayor Jenny Durkan and the Seattle Police Department (SPD) to frame this as a Minneapolis problem, police violence is very much a local problem, too. Seattle police have killed 30 people since coming under federal consent decree in 2012. Che Taylor, Charleena Lyles, John T. Williams, Tommy Le, Shaun Fuhr. All killed by police in our region.

The Urbanist editors, writers, board of directors, and executive director all stand united in our support for the Black Live Matter movement and the protests that have swept the our region, the nation, and the world. We as a community and as individuals must deal with the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow that continue to permeate our society at all levels.

Urbanism and urbanists must take the Black Lives Matter movement to heart. An urbanist advocacy that does not center Black and Brown voices and does not advocate for an inclusive city is not a movement with a future. The housing, mass transit, and public spaces that we advocate for must be accessible to all people, regardless of race, without fear.

The cities we love must be built to include and welcome all people. Black and Brown people must be free to run, walk, and linger in our streets without fear of abuse or death. People must be able to protest in our public spaces without the threat of violence, chemical weapons, or arrest. We must question who has a right to the city, who has a say in their future, and who they are being built to serve. 

Change must start at home including our state and local government. While it’s nice to see small concessions in response to pressure from protesters, the response has been inadequate. Local authorities ended the nightly curfews, belatedly ordered cops to stop covering their badge numbers and name tags, rescinded the request to end federal oversight of SPD, and Mayor Durkan called for a 30-day ban on the use of tear gas. Baby steps–and some of these promises already appear to be broken as tear gas is being replaced by mace canisters and pepper spray-loaded blast balls, and some officers continue to obscure name tags and badges.

We also need to get beyond baby steps. We urge leaders to respond to protesters’ substantive demands:

  1. Defund the Seattle Police Department;
  2. Fund community-based health and safety programs; and
  3. Drop all charges against protesters.

Seattle’s leaders should pledge support and promise a nonviolent police response to the statewide General Strike and Silent March on Friday, June 12th, called for by Black Lives Matter of Seattle-King County. But the action should not stop there. We can’t just talk about funding. We need to do something about it. For too long, America has invested far too much in its police forces and far too little in its social programs. At what point did we decide to become a society that prioritized surveillance, incarceration, and punishment over fostering equitable, healthy, and safe communities? 

In her excellent article, “Defund the Police” in The Atlantic, writer Annie Lowry lays out the powerful statistics that lay behind the protestors’ calls to slash police force budgets. 

A thin safety net, an expansive security state: This is the American way. At all levels of government, the country spends roughly double on police, prisons, and courts what it spends on food stamps, welfare, and income supplements. 

Annie Lowry, “Defund the Police,” The Atlantic

In 2020, Chief Carmen Best proposed a $409 million budget for the Seattle Police Department, representing an increase over the 2019 police expenditure of $363 million. To put these numbers in context, in 2019 Seattle’s general fund budget (excluding City-run utilities) was $1.3 billion, meaning that about 28% of the City’s discretionary budget is being spent on policing. Chief Best’s request would take policing toward a whopping 35% of the budget, as other items have budget cuts to make up the difference. At the same time, the City spent only about $195 million on all Human Services, which includes programs to end homelessness and increase public health in addition to others.

If you feel like those expenditures do not align with your priorities, you are not alone. But apart from voting, what can Seattleites do to ensure the City’s spending upholds community values? The Center for Popular Democracy advocates for participatory budgeting as a means by which communities can regain control over how money is spent, and it is possible that such a shift would have transformative impacts on government investments in Seattle and other cities across the country.

Change must also include White-led groups within our advocacy community, including The Urbanist, examining ourselves and how we can better combat racism. While we have recognized some of our shortcomings and made small steps to reform, it is not enough. We commit to continue challenging ourselves and our organization to be more inclusive and ensure that our advocacy and coverage includes the voices and perspectives of people of color.

We will work to build solidarity with Black people and all people of color in the fight to dismantle White supremacy and racism. In service of that goal, we will seek out opportunities to partner with anti-racist and POC-led organizations for our event and advocacy work. Dismantling racism in our society will be a focus of our coverage.

All cities in America must rise up and join hands to solve the problem of police brutality and systematic racism.

Eric Garner. Sandra Bland. Michael Brown. Shantel Davis. Atatiana Jefferson. Laquan McDonald. Tony McDade. Pamela Turner. Korryn Gaines. Trayvon Martin. Tamir Rice. Walter Scott. Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, and George Floyd. All murdered because of White America’s failure to address racism that has pervaded all of our institutions and especially our criminal justice system. We either stand in the gap to stem the tide or let White silence permit more violence and murder.

The editorial board consists of senior reporter Natalie Bicknell, senior editor Ryan Packer, and Doug Trumm. The board of directors is listed on our staff page.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

The Urbanist was founded in 2014 to examine and influence urban policies. We believe cities provide unique opportunities for addressing many of the most challenging social, environmental, and economic problems. We serve as a resource for promoting and disseminating ideas, creating community, increasing political participation, and improving the places we live.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We need to remember that words have meaning, and must be chosen with care and wisdom. Advocating “defund the police” hands Trump and his minions a cudgel to use against political opponents this November. He will use it to gain votes in the suburbs in the states he needs for re-election. Much better to instead advocate to *reform* and *reorganize* the police.

Douglas Trumm

Call me an idealist, but I think if a policy is right and we believe in it, we should do it rather than sacrificing Black lives in the name of politics. The suburbs thinking they get to run Seattle is very much how we got into this mess. The police themselves are the cudgel Trump is going to use. Let’s disarm them so Trump can’t use them against us. And let’s be real, Trump is not going to win Washington.


Doug, please reread my comment. Nowhere did I suggest not doing things we believe in, or continue sacrificing Black lives! My issue is the *words* we use to describe the work.

Don’t be using language that Trumpsters can and will weaponize against us, words that will come back to haunt us. Frame this work in the positive terms it deserves.

I was watching news tonight about all the demonstrations in small, even tiny towns across this country, quite unlike anything I’ve seen in my life (now in its 8th decade). The potential for great social progress is enormous~ let’s not risk screwing it up.

Doug Trumm

What slogans do you recommend then? I’m glad you agree with policy if not the branding. And are you referring specifically to taking half of SPD’s budget and investing it in communities via things like healthcare, social housing, crisis intervention, and free transit for low income folks?


Let’s be real–the presidential campaign is national, and words used in Washington do not stay in Washington.

I actually think “defund” will work very well – including, and maybe especially, outside of major urban areas. When anyone takes a serious look at how much of police budgets are dedicated to “expensive armed officers doing things for which expensive armed officers are not in the least necessary,” any taxpayer, even if they aren’t a pointy headed-liberal, is going to be really alarmed/annoyed/motivated to support change.


Not after the Trumpsters weaponize “defund” and turn it into removing police protection from the middle class. It’s naive to think voters will “take a serious look” at police budgets during a heated political campaign!

You’re probably not old enough to remember Willie Horton. Please google him, and see what those people are capable of. Let’s not be making it easier for them.

Doug Trumm

There’s always the risk that Trump and the GOP will twist words. Should that guide major policy decisions? My answer is no. Either we start shrinking the size of police departments, the arsenals, and the role of the cop or the preponderance of the evidence shows people, and especially Black people, will die needlessly through excessive policing. Lives really hang in the balance.

There’s little chance for educating voters if we’re not willing to describe our preferred policies. And the truth is on our side. Camden disbanded their police force and only hired back about 40% of officers in a new county-led force. Violent crime dropped and excessive force plummeted.

We have to trust ourselves to have grown as a nation beyond the WIllie Horton days.


For one last time~ it’s the branding, a word you yourself used above. Yes, for sure do all the reforms, but frame them positive. The stakes are too high this time to risk a major screwup.

Please do not underestimate the depths to which Trumpsters will go. They make Lee Atwater look like a choir boy.


@RDPence: How about we listen to black organizers and let them take the lead on this one instead of dictating a message to them?


I’m sure savvy black organizers recognize the importance of framing, of messaging, of getting it right~ they are among those on the left trying to avoid giving a weapon to the Trumpsters. Now, can we please focus on the *substance* of reform?

Douglas Trumm

*Citation needed. But sure let’s talk substance. To be clear, you support a 50% cut to SPD’s budget in order to invest in POC communities via priorities they identify? Just not calling it “defunding”?