King County Metro Transit’s future New Flyer Electric Trolleybus, courtesy of Gordon Werner.

The Metropolitan King County Council is getting serious about climate change. Yesterday, the Council announced that it had come up with a brand new set of policies to curb carbon emissions. The policies will direct two County departments to become carbon neutral, create a new carbon offset program, and allow others like governments, individuals, and private entities to buy credits under the offset program to collectively reduce emissions.

The initiative, called the Transit Carbon Offset Program, is an incredibly unique strategy for the County. Credits that are sold under the program will be directly invested in transit. Yes, transit. Carbon offset programs aren’t new, there are plenty of them out there like clean energy, reforestation, land banking, and funding building rehabilitation. But King County’s new program would be the first of its kind.

Revenue derived from the sale of transit offset credits would be used by King County Metro Transit (Metro Transit). Metro Transit could spend the credits on new service hours or on investments that would provide even more emissions reductions beyond regular operations.

While transit can still be carbon intensive, the service that it provides can more than make up for the fuel burned by running buses. Transit takes cars off of the road, puts less stress on other services, and reduces inefficient land use patterns.

As King County notes, over 118 million trips were made on Metro Transit last year, which is the equivalent of 175,000 fewer cars clogging the roads each weekday, and led to a reduction of over 600,000 metric tons of carbon emissions. That’s a big bite into carbon emissions. Of course, Metro Transit is also leading the way with fleet modernization. The agency boasts a large and growing fleet of hybrid buses, and has the second largest fleet of zero-emission electric trolleybuses in the nation.

The new legislation also requires the Wasterwater Treatment Division and Solid Waste Division to become carbon neutral. The departments are directed to buy carbon offset credits for any emissions that the departments produce. This would therefore make them net carbon neutral. The transit carbon offset credits would be the first type of credit that the departments would be allowed to purchase. Although, the legislation does provide an out should the transit credits not be comparably priced.

To administer the offset program transparently, Metro Transit will consult with a third-party organization to monitor the transit offset credits. The third-party organization will be responsible for verifying how Metro Transit will spend revenue from the offset program. Ultimately, Metro Transit must show that the offset credits go toward programs and service that reduce carbon emissions. This will also help provide a rating and establish the cost basis for each credit. These carbon offsets will be available for purchase by WTD, SWD, other governments, and private individuals and entities.

King County Councilmember Rod Dembowski praised the legislation, which he sponsored, saying:

This is a win-win ordinance. It’s good for our environment and good for our economy. It will make our two utilities carbon-neutral and provide for further investment in Metro Transit, to take even more emissions out of the air. I felt that we needed to take significantly stronger, proactive steps today to address the pressing challenge posed by climate change and local air pollution.

Council Chair Larry Phillips, who co-sponsored the legislation, further emphasized the program’s importance:

With the reality of climate change it’s more critical than ever to continue our commitment to protect the natural resources of our environment. We need to take bold action to meet this challenge and reduce carbon emissions. Investing in energy efficiency and other best practices to reduce greenhouse gases will make a healthier, more sustainable future in King County.

The legislation may appear disconnected to some, but seemingly benign activities like flushing your toilet, throwing food scraps away, and driving to work can have big collective impacts. This legislation wisely looks at our everyday actions and seeks to connect them with a smart solution to reduce air pollution. And while it’s government-focused, it gives businesses and individuals concerned about their environmental impact another practical way to invest their Green dollars. This innovative approach is certainly something that other agencies should consider whether for transit or other valuable carbon-reducing services. For King County though, increased transit service will only help further our collective environmental goals toward a carbon-lite region.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a non-profit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Stephen is an urban planner with a passion for promoting sustainable, livable, and diverse cities. He advocates for smart policies, regulations, and implementation programs that enhance urban environments by committing to quality design, accommodating growth, providing a diversity of housing choices, and adequately providing public services. Stephen primarily writes about land use and transportation issues.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Am I understanding that this article is saying that under the carbon offset program that Metro would have 600,000 metric tons of carbon offsets for sale? And that some (or all) of those offsets will be sold to Wastewater Treatment and Solid Waste?

    Or will the carbon offsets be calculated as the differential between full diesel operation of the bus fleet minus the reduction enabled by hybrid and electric operation?

    • I think the idea is that Metro’s offsets are being generated by taking cars off the road. Further offsets could be generated by making Metro’s fleet more efficient, if the current ones sell out.
      Measuring “potential drivers” is always a trick, of course. And prioritizing transit allocation to generate the most carbon-offsets is also iffy, from an equality perspective.

      • It seems like it’s the owners of the cars that are taking transit that own the carbon offset, not the transit agency It’s kind of like the ability of solar generators that sell power back to the grid and offset their electric power use.

        • OK, I re-read a bit more carefully… The 600k tons aren’t being sold. Instead, just new service/project-work would be sold, which would have a measurable impact on carbon emissions. Similar to how you can pay someone to plant a tree for you, thus offsetting your marathon-watching of Game of Thrones.

          You changing your behavior to emit less carbon shouldn’t net you reward-payments (unless someone else was already paying a carbon offset for you, and they refunded you the difference). You were freeloading on the planet, and now you’re freeloading slightly less. Thanks, but no check for you. Maybe a small tax break or something.

          I guess Metro would need to be careful on how we account for an eliminated ton of CO2. If you were buying a carbon offset, and, having switched to the bus, you reduce that payment, you can’t be claimed by Metro as an offset, as your commute was already carbon neutral. So, in theory, they should only count the (probably vast majority) of car-drivers who don’t pay offsets, who convert to an at-least-partial bus commute.
          Similarly, if you used to bike, because there was no good bus route, but now you take the bus, I guess they’d have to take a loss on that conversion?

          • Thanks, Jeff. I’m still trying to wrap my mind around the concept of what personal or corporate carbon emissions reduction would qualify to be sold as an offset to some other organization’s carbon emissions. Definitely seems like a complex area.

Comments are closed.