The Washington State Legislature is in ongoing legal trouble for failing to properly fund schools. The City of Seattle has many solemn commitments to improving walkability and equity. Why, then, does City code require the school district to spend thousands of dollars every year asking for permission not to turn school property into parking lots?
As shown in these illustrations, if the Seattle School District had complied with the City requirement for private car storage in the recent retrofits at Magnolia and Queen Anne Elementaries it would have obliterated all outdoor play space and a significant amount of indoor education space. The City also requires that the District move school bus loading from the road–a public space already designated for use in mobility–to within the school lot. Doing so at Magnolia and Queen Anne would remove space for education entirely.
Paving playgrounds for parking lots
Following City code requires the district to transform public land for educating children into private car storage.
Seattle is an increasingly dense city with high property values. Seattle Public Schools is continuously renovating and rebuilding existing school sites to accommodate increasing enrollment without purchasing additional property.
Transportation is an equity issue. Affluent families are far more likely to own cars and have the schedule flexibility to drop kids off at school. A site plan that devotes scarce land resources to circulation for privately owned cars is inequitable. A site plan that provides safe and inviting spaces for pedestrians and bicyclists is one that can be equally accessed by all of Seattle’s residents.
Schools with existing dedicated drop-off zones within school property report that managing the drop-off area is staff-intensive and drivers behave in unruly ways that cause traffic jams and injuries. The highest number of student traffic injuries perennially occur inside parking lots. Creating new private car infrastructure sets the expectation that families will be able to easily drive to and from the school at arrival and departure times. Given the logistics of moving many children in a small area at the same time, this unrealistic expectation predictably results in conflict and anger.
Encouraging a dispersed traffic pattern, where families (excluding the medically fragile of course) park remotely in the neighborhood and walk the final block with their kids, produces a safer setting. Sidewalk interactions between families can result in pleasant conversation rather than frustration.
The presence of school buses on the streets around a school slows traffic and makes drivers more aware of school bell times–it is more effective than school zone signs and blinking beacons.
The solution: Change the Seattle Municipal Code. The priority should be on safe routes to school instead of a requirement for on-site parking and drop-off zones. That code change would allow Seattle’s School Traffic Safety Committee to focus efforts on safe routes to school rather than parking plans that are counterproductive to safety.
Author’s note: The City of Seattle School Traffic Safety Committee was created by Ordinance 104344 in 1975 and codified in SMC Chapter 3.80 to bring together Seattle Public Schools, the City, and parents to improve safe routes to school. This board of 11 members brings together Seattle Public Schools (SPS), Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT), Seattle Police Department (SPD), King County Metro, parents, and volunteers.
We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.