One year after the passage of Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) rezones in the Chinatown-International District (CID) neighborhood, the community is contemplating its difficult present and striving to preserve hope for its future. As the crisis of housing affordability continues to escalate across Seattle, displacement is no longer a concern reserved solely for low-income communities, but these communities do continue to bear the burden of the problem.

“The question of how to preserve a neighborhood and its community is a tough one and very angsty,” said Maiko Winkler-Chin Executive Director of SCIDpda, an organization devoted to “preserving, promoting, and developing the Chinatown-International District (CID) as a vibrant community and unique ethnic neighborhood.”  

The difficulty lies not in preserving the historical structures so much as in maintaining the fabric of the community, which according to Winkler-Chin is composed of “the public realm with its buildings, parks, and other structures, but also its people, businesses, and public life.”

The expansion of the International Special Review District in early 2018 means that more buildings outside of Historic Preservation Zone, especially in Little Saigon, must satisfy neighborhood design guidelines intended to maintain the cultural and historic character of the neighborhood, but the anxiety these days is no longer focused on preservation of the unique built environment. Instead advocates fear the loss of the current residents and community.

The boundaries of the International Special Review District recently expanded east into Little Saigon. (City of Seattle)

“130 years can be amazingly long, or just old, depending on your cultural perspective,” Winkler-Chin said. “Still some of things we are trying to preserve here everyone should care about. Displacement is painful. Lots of seniors who live in this neighborhood might be limited English speaking and would be socially isolated if they moved away.”

Local businesses are also at risk of being displaced. “We hope that while some development of this neighborhood is inevitable (and necessary given the overwhelming need for housing in the Seattle area), the district can preserve its unique cultural identity,” said Jessa Timmer, Executive Director of the CIDBIA, “We know that much of this identity is tied up in the businesses that support residents, the regional Asian population, and visitors alike. There is a real concern that new development will bring in businesses that don’t fit or complement the neighborhood as it is now.”

Displacement of API communities is a national problem

The CID is in a particularly treacherous position when it comes to displacement, but it is not alone. Across the country, many historic Asian Pacific Islander (API) communities face displacement as gentrification affects more US cities.

According to a report published by the National CAPACD, while Asian Pacific Islander poverty increased by 50% between 2007 and 2014, a rate more than double the general poverty rate, both rental costs and housing values in API neighborhoods increased at rates well above national averages as well, resulting in widespread displacement of low-income API households. Little Saigon and the CID had net losses of over 350 low-income API families between 2010 and 2014. Overall, the API neighborhoods across the country profiled in the report had a net loss of more than 1,500 low-income families in that time span.

Chinatown-International District has among the highest displacement risk neighborhoods according to a City analysis, but also among the highest access to opportunity. (City of Seattle)

The City of Seattle is aware of this problem. The CID received the highest score of all Seattle neighborhoods for displacement risk and access to opportunity in the Seattle 2035 Growth and Equity report, which states that, “The desirability of [high displacement/high opportunity] neighborhoods attracts new development that could displace marginalized populations in these places.”

A substantial portion of CID residents can be defined as marginalized. In addition to being home to a large percentage of non-English speaking residents, CID is significantly poorer than most of Seattle. According to the most recent census, poverty rates in the tracts that comprise the CID ranged from 42.4% to 34.5%, more than double the city average of 14.5%.

Natalie Bicknell
New construction in Little Saigon next to I-5. The development is a 6 story, 249 unit development with 8,000 square feet of retail on the ground floor. Permitted in 2016, prior to passing of MHA, it will not be subject to its requirements to contribute to affordable housing. Several large-scale developments, including the new Asian Plaza were approved before MHA went into effect. (Photo by author)

Not surprisingly, community activists who observed how the development boom of the early 2000’s in Seattle thrust the CID into a precarious situation are now more worried than ever. “After the economy crashed, we felt like we dodged that bullet,” Winkler-Chin said. “But now, look at a map of the city and look at where the cranes are.”

Hope found in community-driven solutions

We are stepping up our organizing and advocacy,” said Leslie Morishita, Real Estate Development Director of InterIM Community Development Association. “Our resolve is stronger than ever in the face of increasing pressures around displacement.

In addition to increasing its staff to include a full-time community organizer and full-time planning and policy advocate, InterIM is designing its newest affordable housing development in the CID to be a centerpiece for community preservation and activism.  

Named Uncle Bob’s House, after the well-known community activist Bob Santos, a beloved figure in the CID who passed away in 2016, the development will be constructed at 7th and King St, the current site of Four Seas Restaurant, a prominent and important location, directly facing the Wing Luke Museum.

Natalie Bicknell
The current site of Four Seas restaurant and future location of Uncle Bob’s House. Adjacent to the site currently sits House of Hong restaurant. Permits have been filed with the City to demolish the existing structure and build a hotel onsite; however, the case is currently closed. (Photo by author)

Uncle Bob’s House, which will be the first new construction in the CID’s historic core in decades, has passed its preliminary design phase and is expected to break ground in spring of 2019. InterIM is currently in briefings with the International Special Review Board.

“A lot of attention is being paid to the design so that is compatible and reflects the historic pattern in the neighborhood,” Morishita said. “At the same time it is not being designed as a historic building because it is not. But it will honor the history. We named the project after Uncle Bob Santos, similar to other projects we have done [that have honored community figures], but we want to honor Uncle Bob with this project beyond just the name of the building.”

Natalie Bicknell
Directly facing the Wing Luke Museum, Uncle Bob’s House is certain to play a prominent role in the community in the future. (Photo by author)

Discussion is currently being held with Uncle’s Bob’s family, including his wife, State Representative Sharon Tomiko Santos, about how to best create a living legacy at Uncle Bob’s House. Representative Santos came up with the idea of reserving a space in the commercial section of the building for community gatherings and organizing meetings. “As a whole, it is vital that the building have an activism component,” Morishita said.

A few blocks away in the historic Nihonmachi, or Japantown, one can get a glimpse of what this might look like. At Hirabayashi Place, completed by InterIM in 2016, visitors can appreciate the Legacy of Justice, an education and public art installation that tells the story of Gordon Hirabayashi’s courageous defiance of the mass incarceration of Japanese Americans during WWII.

Natalie Bicknell
A glass mural showcasing achievements from the life of Gordon Hirabayashi decorates the Hirabayashi building’s main entrance. (Photo by author)

InterIM has also acquired a vacant lot in Little Saigon where they intend to build a mixed-use affordable housing development. They are currently in discussion with the community over what the best use for the land will be. As a whole, engagement with the community and facilitation of community driven solutions is at the heart of what InterIM does. “In our developments we regularly survey our residents,” Morishita said. “And we make sure that we offer them the services they request and need.”

Concerns over MHA as a driver of displacement

The City of Seattle’s MHA overview specifically promotes MHA rezoning as a tool intended to “minimize displacement of existing residents,” however, not everyone agrees. “MHA helps create affordable housing,” Morishita said. “But it does not address displacement.”

Natalie Bicknell
In what is currently a parking lot next to the Hirabayashi House at 45 S. Main St, Koda Condominums is building a 17 story condo building. Prices range from the low $400,000’s for studio units to $1.4 million for two bedroom units. (Photo by author)

At a June 12th committee meeting, Councilmember Lisa Herbold expressed worries over how a citywide implementation MHA rezoning would accelerate displacement of vulnerable residents if not partnered with anti-displacement policies.

“I just think it’s incredibly important that we move forward with [anti-displacement] strategies parallel to our implementation of mandatory housing affordability,” Councilmember Herbold said. “I don’t want to see these policies developed and implemented after city wide MHA is implemented. I really think we need to do them simultaneously both to reduce impacts and also as part of our message about our priorities in this city being around not just increasing development capacity but making sure that our communities are places where our traditional cultural members of the city can continue to live.”

One of the solutions currently on the table is enacting Community Resident Preference Policies. Councilmember Herbold’s blog states that, “Community resident preferences could address historic and current displacement by providing preference for community residents. If done correctly, these policies could provide affordable housing opportunities, support at-risk communities, and stop segregation. When written poorly on the other hand, community resident preferences can perpetuate segregation.” This description illustrates the central challenge the City faces as it moves forward with exploring these policies. However, advocates, like Winkler-Chin and Morishita, understand the potential difficulties but remain undeterred in their support.

“One of things that we got in the companion resolution to the MHA was to explore neighborhood preference policies and now we are really active in working with the Office of Housing,” Morishita said. “This is a long time issue for InterIm. Fair housing law are great and we need them. They are intended to prevent discrimination to protect a host a people, but they can be a barrier to doing to targeted resident criteria that addresses displacement.”

“We need [community resident] preference lined up because it would be shameful if the city funded projects did not reflect this community,” Winkler-Chin said. “We need it now.”

The City Council is still accepting comments on citywide implementation of MHA rezones in preparation for its upcoming vote scheduled for fall 2018. To learn more and submit comments, go the Select Committee on Citywide Mandatory Housing Affordability website.  

Explore Culture, History and Urban Design in the Chinatown International District this July

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Natalie Bicknell Argerious (she/her) is Managing Editor at The Urbanist. A passionate urban explorer since childhood, she loves learning how to make cities more inclusive, vibrant, and environmentally resilient. You can often find her wandering around Seattle's Central District and Capitol Hill with her dogs and cat. Email her at natalie [at] theurbanist [dot] org.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jonathan Mark

Since the author’s bio indicates employment in promoting Waterfront Seattle I would suggest considering the potential for the waterfront projects to promote displacement in the Chinatown-International District (CID).

The CID appears to be gerrymandered out of the area where Waterfront Seattle proposes to increase property prices and tap part of that increase for funding (see map link). But realistically, if Waterfront Seattle indeed increases property prices throughout downtown plus everything south of Denny in South Lake Union, it is hard not to see this effect extending to the CID which is nearby the Pioneer Square improvements:

comment image

But I certainly would not propose extending the Local Improvement District (LID) assessments to cover the CID. Rather, since downtown populations are also considered at high risk of displacement (although not as high risk as the CID) I would hope we would reevaluate Waterfront Seattle. The Waterfront Seattle plan was conceived in 2011/2012 when there was less of an equity and displacement focus, then shelved for 3-4 years by the Bertha delay, and now its claim to increase downtown property prices looks like a very questionable idea given the development of Seattle’s affordability crisis.


What a joke. Sure, 913 S Jackson St was permitted pre-HALA, but it’s an affordable project (for persons earning $37,000 or less!) built on a former half empty half fruit shed lot. Find a better example of displacement.

And don’t use KODA either; it will replace a !@#$ parking lot and will help stitch CID and Downtown back together. And don’t use Moriguchi’s apartment tower that will replace a historic… parking lot. And don’t use Four Seasons; it was a single-story restaurant well past its glory days (like we’re lacking in those in CID). Don’t use 1032 S Jackson, where the owner is selling as-permitted and planned to have the grocery return with new housing with new childcare facilities with some new hotel units with some new housing with a new community theater. Don’t use LIHI’s new headquarters at 1253 S Jackson; it has 69 new affordable units on top. Don’t use Plymouth Housing’s project at Rainier & King; it’s adding 105 new affordable units. I could go on and on and on.

The grim reaper is doing more displacement in CID than new development.


The last thing Uncle Bob’s House should have is more community meeting space sitting empty 90% of the time. Wing Luke has space. Hing Hay Coworks has space. Nagomi Tea House is space. There’s space in the newly doubled in size Hing Hay Park. There’s tons of brand new community space in Yesler Terrace. Let’s not forget that we have two stadiums if you need space for 50,000+. There’s space with the drunks in the alley behind Union Market. There’s a plaza on top of the CID light rail station. There’s space in Union Station. There’s space in King St Station and outside it. There’s space in all our parking lots. There’s an empty storefront in the Ft. St. George building and at Publix; either one could be a great place for community space. There’s space at the local library branch. SCIDpda has community space. The NVC Memorial Hall is space.

But I notice there’s no mention of community space availble on InterIm CDA’s website. Could it be that their interest is in building their own community space? Oh, I get it, this would be *their* community meeting space.

Why not dense housing over mixed retail? That’s served the entire neighborhood (and even some outside visitors) really well for… well, forever.