The Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) has abruptly removed most of the planter boxes that it had placed on Wilson Ave S in the Seward Park neighborhood to provide a buffer between a new protected bike lane and a lane of free street parking.

The increased hazard for people biking caused by the removal of the planters appeared to take a backseat to the desires of other community members in making this decision, which was announced on a Friday and completed by Sunday. SDOT’s Ethan Bergerson told The Urbanist that they were “removed at the request of the people who live in the neighborhood.”

In response to a question about what prompted their removal, Bergerson continued: “For context, we originally added the planters between the flex posts based on requests from the Wilson Ave S neighbors who wanted something more visually appealing than just posts. However, after the planters were installed, these same neighbors said that they no longer wanted them because they didn’t have room to open their passenger car doors and they weren’t as nice to look at as they imagined. We also heard reports of numerous cars bumping the planters into the bike lane and creating obstacles for people on bikes.”

Proposed design for Wilson Ave S as installed last year. (City of Seattle)
Proposed design for Wilson Ave S as installed last year. (City of Seattle)

The protected bike lane was installed last year as part of planned repaving work. After the planters were initially installed in July, SDOT went back out in August and moved them “so they will be 20-40 feet apart and will no longer be side-by-side next to parking spots.” Some planters were removed that were adjacent to business areas. But apparently parking issues persisted, in addition to some local disappointment in the planters’ aesthetics. SDOT has left planters in select locations near intersections to avoid people parking and obstructing views but considers plastic posts alone to be sufficient protection for most of the bike lane. However, do people biking on the corridor feel the same way?

Tonya Ricks Sterr, who lives near Wilson Avenue, told me in a message she felt differently. “Plastic posts, or nothing, is not going to be enough separation for me to feel comfortable letting my nearly-6-year-old riding this stretch of road anymore,” she said. “I was so excited for him to gain the confidence of riding on an actual road, and to not feel absolutely terrified while doing so!”

She continued, “Folks who just want a way to get around our city safely worked really hard to advocate for this stretch of road. It’s incredibly disheartening when the small scraps we earned (only one direction protected) is being taken away. Drivers still speed down Wilson, easily evidenced by the frequent collision reports. Paint won’t protect us.”

She also submitted a photograph taken this past Monday, after the planters had been removed, showing a vehicle parked in the bike lane, which is now easier to access given the distance between plastic posts and no planter boxes.

Truck parked in the Wilson Ave S protected bike lane this week after planter removal (Tonya Ricks Sterr)

The issue of maintaining the planters likely contributed to their removal. Since they were not anchored to the road, planters that were hit by a car would often end up in the bike lane. Plants in the boxes also also required tending to. But again, those are issues to be solved in the interest of the purpose the planters provide: making people on bikes feel safer.

The original purpose of the planters was to provide protection, which they do better than posts. The fact remains that most of the key segments of Seattle’s bike network are being constructed with only a post divider. Some of these streets have a lot of fast moving traffic, like Dearborn Ave S. The department has struggled to maintain even these posts, but they don’t provide adequate protection.

This planter saga on Wilson Ave S follows a different issue that SDOT encountered with similar planter boxes. In 2018, the 2nd Avenue protected bike lane had planters removed from a stretch directly adjacent to the Chief Seattle Club, because the planters were being used to sit on or congregate around. Essentially, the architecture was made more hostile in order to encourage people to move along.

In that case as well, the real or perceived safety of people using the bike lane appeared to be secondary to other considerations. Who knows where it could happen next.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a non-profit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Ryan Packer lives in the Summit Slope neighborhood of Capitol Hill & has been writing for the blog since 2015. He reports on multimodal transportation issues, #visionzero, preservation, and local politics. He believes in using Seattle's history to help attain the vibrant, diverse city that we all wish to inhabit.

14 COMMENTS

  1. I wonder if Mr Parker (or anyone else who have commented here) has been to Wilson Ave much less biked along there. I have lived in this neighborhood since 1992 and am both a driver and a cyclist. the planters were butt-ugly, completely out of place, unmaintained and an additional obstacle to cyclists and drivers alike. they were not intended to increase protection for cyclists. I am glad they are removed. many had been bumped into what is actually a more narrow than is typical bike lane already. and passengers could not get out of their cars. they were a completely unnecessary nuisance and lacked any aesthetic value at all. It is unfortunate that those who do not live in the area much less travel through it make assumptions about the situation. I personally have seen a lot of these so-called “protected” bike lanes become trashed and unmaintained and then when the posts and other obstacles are added, it leaves little room to maneuver for cyclists. I have little faith they will be routinely monitored to maintain any semblance of safety.

  2. Who wants to bet that the remaining protection (curb, posts) WON’T will be run over multiple times within 1 week? Bet me. I dare you.

    You won’t, because you know it won’t matter the shape, size, or number of inanimate objects – drivers will hit them with their cars.

    Before the 2nd Ave bike lane even opened, one of the bike signals – a SOLID, STATIONARY METAL PILLAR OVER 10 FEET TALL was wiped out by a car. Just sitting there, got run over.

    Cars hit inanimate objects. Over and over and over. Drivers don’t pay attention. Over and over and over.

    And we argue about the inanimate objects.

  3. It’s really unfortunate that we can’t get a real curb put in on these “protected” bike lanes. The posts don’t do anything to keep cyclists safe from cars.

  4. I agree with Mark Wolf. SDOT says that “neighbors…wanted something more visually appealing than just posts.” Yet what they provided those neighbors was butt-ugly, and not even fastened to the road! Looks like this effort was designed to fail.

  5. Your picture of the bike lane is far from the reality of the typical protected bike lane in South Seattle which is full of debris. Try biking on Columbian Way where prior to the protected bike lane ‘upgrade’ debris was not an issue. Now the bike lane is never cleaned by street equipment despite regular cleaning on that street.

  6. Cyclists don’t need perfect protection, they need something effective, and curbs have been protecting pedestrians from motorists for decades.

    Obstacles are not a good way to protect a bike lane. Planters are good for protecting a gov’t building, maybe an embassy. Plastic stanchions get scuffed by cars to the point of blending in with the pavement, or ripped out leaving bolts protruding from the pavement.

    Places with high bike usage, like Copenhagen, have half-height curbs that separate the bike lane from the road, with another half-height to separate the sidewalk from the bike lane. It doesn’t require any special maintenance, and street sweepers can still access the bike lane.

  7. Though the intent was good, this project was so poorly planned and executed that its failure is no surprise to anyone in the neighborhood. The cheap, dirt filled plastic boxes warped and bulged unattractively. To make matters worse, they were left unplanted to grow weeds and collect trash. It’s hard to believe that this was the result of any serious thought or planning.

  8. Removing bike lane barriers because cars run into them is like removing a bulletproof vest because people keep shooting at it!

  9. So the bikers get their own lane, and now they complain they don’t feel safe in it? Maybe they should wear big inflated protective suits. Or buy all five of them a car.

Comments are closed.