Examining urban policy to improve cities and quality of life.

  • Features
    • Spatial Planning
      • Architecture
      • Land Use & Development
      • Parks & Public Space
      • Plans & Policy
    • Transportation
      • Cycling
      • Driving
      • Transit
      • Walking
    • Economics & Politics
      • Economics
      • Housing
      • Politics & Government
      • Social Welfare
    • Culture & Innovation
      • Civics & Culture
      • Education
      • Environment & Sustainability
      • Technology
  • Calendar
  • About
    • Organization Profile
    • Policy Principles
    • Organization Staff
    • Elections Board
    • Guest Contributors
    • Comment Policy
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
  • Write For Us
Cycling/Plans & Policy/Transit/Transportation

Roosevelt BRT Needs to Be BRT and Serve Bikes

by Charles Bond @Charles_B_STB on December 10, 2015

Last night, the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) held an open house on the Roosevelt HTC project. It was revealed that the overall project aim has shifted from the earlier stages. SDOT neither plans a streetcar extension nor implementation of full bus rapid transit (BRT). Instead, the transportation agency is planning “targeted enhancements” to Metro’s RapidRide service, what they’re calling “RapidRide+”. Essentially, this will be better than RapidRide, but without all of the bells and whistles of Madison BRT, the region’s next gold standard for BRT. SDOT hopes to have the new BRT corridor up and running some time around 2020.

Exclusive lanes in South Lake Union.
Exclusive lanes in South Lake Union.

Among the enhancements Roosevelt RapidRide+ will receive are:

  • Exclusive lanes or BAT lanes in South Lake Union;
  • Queue jumps and signal priority for much of the route;
  • Electrification from South Lake Union to Northgate.
Exclusive lanes please?
Exclusive lanes? Yes please!

SDOT is still teasing out other options for the project. At the top of the list are bicycle lanes. Some options included them, some didn’t. Many of the audience members present were clearly bicyclists, and they were out in droves to push SDOT to provide better biking facilities along the corridor, in the spirit of the Bicycle Master Plan. Ultimately, a final plan will almost certainly include new bicycle lanes, but the issue comes down to the degree at what cost to other modes.

Advertisement

Two other primary issues that SDOT is hashing out are exclusive lanes elsewhere and a shared bus fleet with the Madison BRT project. SDOT staff think that other parts of the route may necessitate exclusive bus lanes. Indeed, adding these at chokepoints and throughout the corridor would speed up overall bus service and encourage more riders. Pinning down where to make this happen will be key for the next phase of the project. Meanwhile, there’s a very real possibility that Roosevelt BRT buses could be shared with its sister corridor on Madison. Those buses will be electrified with doors on both sides, opening the potential for calling at stops to the left or right; one possibility even includes serving stops along the South Lake Union Streetcar corridor.

Almost no bus lanes on Eastlake.
Almost no bus lanes on Eastlake.
Crossing the Mercer Mess.
Crossing the Mercer Mess.

Yet, SDOT staff are facing some challenges, including:

  • Very limited funds for the project;
  • Narrow right-of-way (five lanes wide) on Eastlake meaning that difficult choices will have to be made to fit cars, bikes, and buses; and
  • Difficulty getting exclusive lanes through the intersection of Eastlake Avenue and Mercer Street.

Get Involved

The potential “exclusive lanes” issue is where fellow urbanists, bicyclists, and transit riders come in. SDOT is open, more or less, to priority for bicycles, buses, or bicycles and buses, depending on demand from the community. We need to work together on this to demand bus and bicycle priority for the entire route, insofar as it’s possible to do.

There is one more meeting tonight (December 10th) at UW Tower in the University District. If you care about bus and bicycle access in Northeast Seattle, and want to make the most of our Proposition 1 dollars for bicycle and transit priority, please come to the open house and make yourself heard. And if you can’t do that, fill out the online survey.

Advertisement

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider supporting our work. The Urbanist is a nonprofit that depends on donations from people like you.

Facebook Twitter Tumblr Reddit Email 0
Klyde Warren's Park's street edges are activated with food trucks, clear sight lines, and flexible seating. (Photo by the author)
Previous Post

Lidding I-5 in Downtown Seattle: Site Analysis and Interim Solutions

A visualization of I-5's complex weave of ramps and lanes. (Graphic by the author)
Next Post

Lidding I-5 in Downtown Seattle: Design Guidelines and Moving Forward

Charles Bond

Charles is an avid cyclist that uses his bike as his primary mode of transportation. He grew up in the Puget Sound, but previously spent time overseas living in Japan. He covers a range of topics like cycling, transit, and land use. His time in Tokyo really opened his eyes to what urbanism offers people and has a strong desire to see growth happen in Seattle.

Donate

The Urbanist is a 501(c)4 nonprofit. We largely depend on donations to handle our ongoing costs. Monthly donations are greatly apprecated from regular readers.

Search

Advertisement

Connect

Random 5

  • 1

    Is ST3 Fully Serving Ballard?

  • 2

    Relocating a Pronto! station for the sake of political correctness

  • 3

    First Post-Rezone U District Highrise Proposal Has Received Design Review Recommendation

  • 4

    Get Ready For Participatory Budgeting

  • 5

    Autonomous Vehicle and E-bike Regulation Among Transportation Bills Headed to Governor

Comments

  • Donn on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • Donn on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • Luke on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • Luke on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process
  • Miranda on Neighbors Call Shenanigans on Wallingford Community Council’s “Democratic” Process

Twitter

Follow @urbanistorg

The Urbanist
@urbanistorg

  • Excellent piece delving into eviction practices at @SeattleHousing Authority and King County Housing Authority. https://t.co/npb5az555o
    about 47 mins ago
  • Some suggestions to improve @wsferries: ⛴️ Design urban multimodal ferry terminals ⛴️ Create a more equitable fare… https://t.co/OCbds7UOyN
    about 1 hour ago
  • As other local groups like @WelcomingWally organize in favor of Mandatory Housing Affordability, Wallingford Commun… https://t.co/AO0t86sazi
    about 1 hour ago

Instagram

See More
Follow

The Urbanist was founded in early 2014 in order to examine and influence urban policies. We believe cities provide unique opportunities for addressing many of the most challenging social, environmental, and economic problems. We serve as a resource for promoting and disseminating ideas, creating community, increasing political participation, and improving the places we live.

Join us each month in Downtown Seattle for a social gathering to talk about urban issues and hear from local thought leaders.

When: Second Tuesday / 5.30pm - 7.30pm
Where: Elephant & Castle / 1415 Fifth Avenue, Seattle

Questions: info@theurbanist.org

Publication content licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 US.

Back to Top
sponsored