Long roadways in Seattle like Rainier, MLK, and Aurora cut scars across Seattle’s landscape and have their share of bad intersections. But, even though the main stretch of Denny, from Puget Sound to Capitol Hill, is shorter than those examples, it has more terrible intersections than any of them. And, with South Lake Union burgeoning with people walking, biking, busing, and driving there, those intersections are more clogged than ever.

As a person walking–and this competition has been developed from a pro-pedestrian perspective–your odds of having a clear intersection to cross are about as good as the odds of the Route 8 bus being on time.

Denny and Stewart from above. (Google Maps)
Denny and Stewart from above. (Google Maps)

Of the five times that we’ve done this poll, an intersection with Denny Way has now won three times.

But is it because intersections along Denny are just that bad? Or because the demographic that lives and works in the area is more likely to be focused on transportation issues and pedestrian problems than people in South Seattle?

Regardless, nobody can dispute that Denny and Stewart is an awful intersection for all users.

If Seattle founding father Arthur Denny had lived past the 19th century, he probably would have been hit by a driver at an intersection along Denny Way by now. In fact, back in 1971 when Amazon was still just a rainforest and a river, this intersection at Stewart was the most dangerous in the city.

It’s no surprise that this intersection is the worst today, 46 years later, given that there are no easy solutions.

The other Denny intersections that have claimed the “Worst Intersection” title are more fixable. At Fifth Avenue, the titleholder in 2012, the Seattle Department of Transportation just needs to put a crosswalk on the eastern side of the intersection, stripe the south crosswalk parallel to Denny, and #GivePedstheGreen. Improvements for 2015’s choice (Denny at Terry) are on the way with a pedestrian signal being planned.

Denny and Stewart lies at the southeastern corner of the Cascade neighborhood, which is sometimes called the Heart of Seattle. If that’s the case, then Denny and Stewart is its main coronary blockage caused by traffic backups stemming from I-5.

Long lines at the airport are controlled with stanchions, but there’s no equivalent for traffic management.

However, a slight improvement is coming for eastbound bus riders, who will have a dedicated bus lane leading up to Stewart Stewart starting in early 2018.

Denny Way bus queue jump in three-lane eastbound configuration between Fairview and Yale. (The Seattle Times)
Denny Way bus queue jump in three-lane eastbound configuration between Fairview and Yale. (The Seattle Times)

But that doesn’t fix things for pedestrians.

Riders waiting for the 8 bus at the southwest corner of Denny and Stewart have a front-row seat for the symphony of stink coming from vehicle exhaust.

People walking toward Capitol Hill have to cross Stewart Street here before the hill climb over I-5. This crosswalk is most often clogged by opportunistic and aggressive drivers, claiming their spot in line for the freeway.

The northeast corner of the intersection should be avoided. You can’t get up to Capitol Hill from here anyway, since there’s no sidewalk on that side of the bridge, and there’s barely anywhere to stand. If you walk southward from here to go to Capitol Hill, look over your shoulder for overeager drivers headed for Capitol Hill.

As you cross to the northwest intersection from the northeast, watch for drivers who are trying to turn right on red onto Denny. If you’re heading to the northwest intersection from the southwest, watch for drivers who are trying to turn right on green onto Denny.

And, if you’re on the south side of Yale Avenue, you’ll have to hurry to get across both Yale and Denny before the next light cycle.

So, is there any way to make things better?

First, drivers need to avoid blocking the crosswalk or face a fine. And, turning right on red from Stewart to Denny should be banned.

A more difficult possibility includes adding a sidewalk on the north side of Denny Way over I-5. This would mean that uphill vehicles would need to share a single lane, but make it much easier for people on foot to get between South Lake Union and Capitol Hill.

The only other reasonable solution would be congestion pricing to reduce traffic. If drivers had to pay a fee to get on I-5 at Yale, fewer people would go that way, decreasing traffic backups and making the intersection much calmer. The revenue brought in from these tolls could fund more mass transit.

That’s unlikely to happen soon, however. So I’d predict that we’ll still be talking about Denny and Stewart as one of the worst intersections in Seattle in another 46 years.

Title image courtesy of Google Maps.

Vote For Seattle’s Worst Intersection: 2017

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Troy is a pedestrian advocate who serves on the board of Seattle Neighborhood Greenways. He loves cities and walking, hiking, and biking. He wrote a book to help others looking to find the right place for them, called Move to the Place of Your Dreams: A Relocation Handbook. By day, he is a professional consultant for a technology firm.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

1 word: rotary. Or the north American version, roundabout

Neel B4 Zod

Where do more people die? Rainier Ave S or Denny Way? I’m honestly asking because I don’t know the answer. Denny is clogged, annoying, and exasperating to more people. Which street kills more though?

This part of your article is exactly right:

“But is it because intersections along Denny are just that bad? Or because the demographic that lives and works in the area is more likely to be focused on transportation issues and pedestrian problems than people in South Seattle?”

Here’s a guess – Annoyance and delay loom larger in your average commuter’s mind than deaths, injuries, or property damage. That’s not a kind thing to say and makes people seem self-centered and callous. But I think our feelings guide our judgments, so we vote for the ‘worst’ based more on that annoyance emotion than based on an actual sober, fact-based risk assessment. Which would clearly show that streets that kill more people are worse.

Of course, if the stats show more people die in accidents on Denny than any other street, well… then… the 2 converge.

Anyone know where the most people die? Denny or some other street?

Doug T

Something to consider is that this is about worst intersection, not most dangerous street. Three intersections were nominated that included a crossing of Rainier Avenue in the voting. One of them was a very close contender for this year’s title.

Traditionally, Rainier Avenue has been considered the most deadly and had seen the most crashes per mile driven. But that appears to be changing and Rainier Avenue traffic safety stats are improving, likely largely related to the road diet (re-channelization) through the Columbia City section. Advocates are hoping to extend the road diet to further improve safety and placemaking along the corridor. https://southseattleemerald.com/2017/02/23/whats-in-store-for-rainier-avenue-in-2017/

Neel B4 Zod

Totally understand the difference, and I think there should be one, between “worst” and “deadliest.” The broader point for me is how and whether one influences the other.


I nominated this intersection for its collision-prone-ness. There has been a pedestrian collision every single year at Stewart and Denny going back as far as the SDOT Vision Zero dashboard goes, to 2004. http://seattlevisionzero.azurewebsites.net/map.html

Neel B4 Zod

Thanks for the link. I’m scrolling through all the data now.

Al Dimond

If we were going to choose the worst by stats alone, we wouldn’t be voting!

A lot of the collisions on Rainier involve drivers losing control of cars, apparently at excessive speeds. Such collisions are spread along the corridor; they point to problems with the corridor overall rather than particular intersections, and their solutions may not be at particular intersections. There are some particular problem-intersections along Rainier, too! The I-90 ramps, 23rd, and MLK come to mind first (as specific, important intersections with particularly bad walking characteristics).

On Denny traffic congestion limits car speeds, but it’s plagued with thoughtlessly designed intersections on its south side and bad driving behaviors (like crosswalk-blocking) that concentrate at particular intersections due to chronic congestion. These are more straightforwardly “bad intersections”. And there are lots of pedestrians there to vote for them. Rainier/MLK has lots of pedestrians due to Mount Baker High School, but students probably aren’t so well represented in the polling. Though I agree it seems about time to recognize a Rainier intersection, I don’t think the Denny ones are unjustifiable “winners”. Denny really does have a lot of horrible intersections.

Neel B4 Zod

There’s plenty of awful to go around! I think the broader discussion is whether and how deaths, injuries, and property damage fit into a formula around prioritization. It’s worth agonizing over so we’re constantly making it better.