Crosscut‘s opinion section is dead, the publication’s new executive editor M. David Lee III announced last week. The move will deprive Seattle of another major venue for thoughtful opinion pieces. The reasoning? Apparently, the board of Cascade Media (which runs Crosscut and KCTS public television) thought the opinion section had drifted too far left and struggled to get “enough” conservative voices.

Despite the board criticism, Crosscut opinion section had been a venue for some major conservative leaders in the state.

“In the recent past, those pieces have included opinions by former Washington state Republican Party chair Chris Vance, Republican congressman Dan Newhouse, right-wing radio host John Carlson, and Bryant,” Publicola‘s Erica Barnett noted in a Tuesday column. “Nonetheless, board members have reportedly raised concerns over the years that the opinion page slants left. The governing board that oversees the site includes a former Seattle Times editorial board member, former Republican attorney general and gubernatorial candidate Rob McKenna, and Amazon global real estate VP John Schoettler.”

Lee, who was hired away from the CBS affiliate in Green Bay, Wisconsin, agreed with the board’s take and sent a memo to Crosscut staff announcing he was ending the opinion section almost immediately upon assuming his new posting. The changes the board and new executive editor are implementing happen right as Crosscut lost one of its best reporters in David Kroman. Kroman accepted a job as a transportation reporter at The Seattle Times, but he said his move was not in reaction to the change in leadership. His broader City Hall coverage will be missed.

The announcement has laid bare an identity crisis both at Crosscut and the media landscape regionwide. Crosscut doesn’t want to be the region’s progressive publication. But who does?

A generation ago, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer (PI) played the more progressive foil to the region’s most-read newspaper: the Seattle Times — not to mention like-minded business papers like Daily Journal of Commerce and the Puget Sound Business Journal. However, the P-I stopped going to print in 2009. The Stranger took up the mantle as “Seattle’s only newspaper” — a dig at the fact Seattle Times publisher Frank Blethen lives on Mercer Island and embodies an Eastside rather than Seattle perspective.

The Stranger is also struggling to make ends meet and went from a weekly publication to a fortnightly even before the pandemic ripped a hole in its business. Federal relief funds helped plug some budget holes, but the staff is a shell of its former self as revenue has decreased. Many of its high-profile reporters have left for the Seattle Times (Heidi Groover and Sydney Brownstone), freelancing (Nathalie Graham), careers as political staffers (Ansel Herz), or Substack/law school (Eli Sanders).

As progressive print media shrinks, TV landscape is consolidating in conservative hands. The ultra-conservative Sinclair family purchased KOMO TV in 2018, and nearly immediately forced conservative framing, especially on issues like the homelessness crisis. Q13 is the local Fox affiliate — Fox is the media empire built by conservative billionaire Rupert Murdoch. That leaves KING TV and KIRO TV for those who don’t want to get news through a conservative prism, but that doesn’t mean either is progressive in framing. KING is Owned by publicly traded Tegna company (formerly Gannett) and KIRO TV is owned by Cox Media Group, while the KIRO radio arm is owned by a conglomerate wholly owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and dedicated to family values oriented broadcasting. And with KCTS public TV under the same management as Crosscut, Seattle doesn’t really have a progressive local TV outlet, although there are many flavors of conservative and centrist.

Clearly, conservative media takeover by extreme fact-free alt-right outlets — from Fox News to Breitbart and Zero Hedge — is having an impact on our national debate and making consensus very hard on commonsense interventions for the economy, public health, and climate change mitigation. The same thing could be happening on a smaller scale with the erosion of local progressive media and the domination of centrist and right-wing framing.

Erica Barnett and Josh Feit left The Stranger to found the online publication Publicola, which serves at another progressive anchor in a sea of centrist media. But Publicola, The Stranger, the South Seattle Emerald, Capitol Hill Seattle Blog, Real Change, and yours truly at The Urbanist can only do so much against the rising tide of conservative and centrist media. Working with less funding and legacy media members sometimes looking down their noses at us, we try.

However, the results of the 2021 election shows centrist messaging is winning the day, at least in an election in which frustration with the status quo was sky-high and desire to hear about complicated, nuanced policy interventions was low. This isn’t only a problem stemming from media environment. Progressives must also adapt and run tighter campaigns. But a more hospitable media environment for progressive ideas and a more critical environment for vague centrist talking points certainly wouldn’t hurt.

Harrell wears a blazer and gestures toward tents in the background.
Bruce Harrell points to a mess, speaking near a homeless encampment on Broadview-Thomson school grounds. (Photo courtesy of KING 5)

For a city that often wears its progressive reputation like a badge of honor, the media landscape doesn’t match.

Both Crosscut and Seattle Weekly (an alternative paper which closed shop last year) were founded by David Brewster, who has since moved on to launch the blog Post Alley and a private subscription-based library called the Athenaeum. Despite the Cascade Media anxieties that progressives had infiltrated the Crosscut ranks, a perusing of Post Alley should put to bed any worries that Crosscut or Seattle Weekly were long run as a progressive puppets. Post Alley seems to have collected a wide assortment of partially retired journalists and politicos looking to share nearly identical centrist views and gripe about the excesses of Leftist extremists. Longtime P-I politics reporter Joel Connelly is right at home in such a environment, which also seems to cast doubts on how progressive the P-I really was.

Still Crosscut‘s penchant for publishing progressive opinion pieces did make it unique in a region where getting such pieces in the Seattle Times is like passing through a crucible. The Seattle Times opinion page will run dozens of stories fastidiously adhering to conservative messaging on the issues of the day, whether homelessness, policing, criminal justice, or how mean Nicole Thomas-Kennedy’s tweets were. Advocates for a progressive view, however, will struggle to find comparable mouthpieces.

As a result, when progressive proposals arise, they are lambasted in the Seattle Times — sometimes even before they’re officially rolled out, while the progressive response is drowned out. This is what happened with the single family zoning changes that the Housing Affordability Livability Agenda (HALA) committee were mulling in 2015. Seattle Times columnist Denny Westneat got his hands on a draft report and sunk the idea with an inflammatory article before the final proposal had even seen the light of day. The ensuing uproar caused Mayor Ed Murray to abandon broad single family zoning reform. This has put Seattle behind peer cities like Portland, Minneapolis, Olympia, and perhaps soon Tacoma, all of which have loosened zoning restrictions in single family zones.

And, the anti-upzone framing sometimes has bled into news coverage, too, such as when they regurgitated NIMBY talking points rather than take a sober look at displacement risk. Plus, the Seattle Times broke a former taboo by selling a front page above-the-fold political ad, and a negative attack at that, targeting Thomas-Kennedy.

The Seattle Times editorial board doesn’t always get what it wants. The region passed Sound Transit 2 and Sound Transit 3 light rail measures despite their strident endorsements against it. The Seattle City Council passed the JumpStart payroll tax despite a steady drumbeat of Seattle Times editorials and opinion pieces railing against it. But the headwinds in mainstream media do make it hard to build momentum behind progressive policy and carry that into the next election.

While it seems unlikely one publication with arise with half a million daily readers will arise to be a progressive counterbalance to the Seattle Times, a strong ecosystem of small- to mid-sized publications willing to question centrist framing and give progressive narratives a fair shake could potentially do the trick.

On a personal note, I’m grateful to our subscribers who make The Urbanist’s efforts to tell this story possible.


Correction: This article was updated to note KIRO-TV is not owned by the same company as KIRO radio, which had been incorrectly stated before. Also added context from Kroman who said he did not leave due to the change in leadership at Cascadia Media and will cover more than just the Seattle Monorail, which had been a joke.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Doug Trumm is The Urbanist's Executive Director. An Urbanist writer since 2015, he dreams of pedestrianizing streets, blanketing the city in bus lanes, and unleashing a mass timber building spree to end the affordable housing shortage and avert our coming climate catastrophe. He graduated from the Evans School of Public Policy and Governance at the University of Washington. He lives in East Fremont and loves to explore the city on his bike.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cam Solomon

Sorta OT. I only recently have attempted to consistenly visit this site, and am pleasantly suprised by the broad subject matter and healthy stable of authors. Kudos. I particularly appreciate your attempts at coverage of the broader region beyond Seattle, as a Tacoma resident.

But I’m also surprised by the lack of discourse in the comments section, compared to sites like STB. Is this a reflection of low readership, or simply lack of engagement?

Just curious.

Cam Solomon

Or maybe something else? A poor interface that makes it hard to follow comment threads? A heavy-handed approach to moderation?

Douglas Trumm

Thanks for reading, Cam. We’re glad you’ve been enjoying the Tacoma coverage. I think our readers are less comment-focused than some other publications. We generally take a light touch with moderating, so long as people don’t violate our comment policy. https://www.theurbanist.org/about-us/comment-policy/

Last edited 13 days ago by Douglas Trumm
sparkles

Seattle still has: The Urbanist, Seattle Transit Blog (via seattle subway endorsements), Seattle Bike Blog, The Stranger, PubliCola, and SCC Insight.

Not to mention the various left-leaning neighborhood blogs (Capitol Hill Seattle Blog, South Seattle Emerald, others?).

This still seems like a pretty healthy mix of left-leaning media outlets, honestly possibly even over-saturated for a relatively small city like Seattle.

asdf2

I agree. This is not at all a situation for alarm, as there are still plenty of places for left-leaning people to post their opinions.

Also, I’ve said this before, but I do wish that urbanism and progressivism were more decoupled from each other in the eyes of politicians and the media. You shouldn’t need to believe in socialized housing or medicine to appreciate streets that allow people to walk or bike where they’re going without getting run over. Or allow people to take a walk in their neighborhood without the constant roar and fumes of internal combustion engines. Even towns that voted for Donald Trump by wide margins still have 25 mph speed limit signs on their streets (I’ve driven through several of them). In New York City, even Republican candidates don’t call the subway system communist or promise to get rid of it. Michael Bloomberg did a lot for urbanism over there, including pedestrianizing Times Square and making buses run faster, even though he was certainly not a progressive.

Of all the local publications I’ve seen, Seattle Transit Blog seems to come to closest to advocating pure urbanism, strongly supporting transit, walkability, and zoning reform, while taking a neutral stance on general moderate vs. progressive issues unrelated to transit or land use. I wish I would see more of this elsewhere.

tacomee

Question. Is Mayor Bruce an urbanist? This website took the last election like an arrow in the chest…. even though the winners are a pretty urban bunch.

Douglas Trumm

It’d be great if Harrell turns out to be an urbanist. But when he makes a point to say he “won’t lead with bikes” and sought to demonize his opponent for “abolishing” single family zoning, these aren’t the actions of an urbanist. Those seem like NIMBY dogwhistles to me. His career on council was interesting because he did take some good votes here and there, but there’s also examples of him doing anti-urbanist things like advocating for more parking at light rail stations, opposing the Roosevelt station area upzone in 2013, and obstructing some safe streets projects in D2. I mentioned most of these example in our coverage, including our post on his announcement. https://www.theurbanist.org/2021/03/16/bruce-harrell-stakes-claim-to-center-lane-in-seattle-mayoral-announcement/

Ben

I think the Seattle Times is a pretty solid local newspaper. I don’t agree with the vast majority of their editorials, but I think it’s impressive that in an era when local newspapers are dying, the Times has maintained a roster of really great reporters.

Regarding the Times’ political and policy editorials, they’re certainly moderate or conservative, but I think the evidence that they move a lot of voters during election seasons is mixed, at best. In the 2015 city council races the Time went 5/9 in their endorsements (the whole council was on the ballot)). In 2016, the Times was opposed to ST3. In 2017, they endorsed Jenny Durkan, but then they endorsed people who lost to Lorena Gonzalez, Teresa Mosqueda, and Pete Holmes. In 2019, their endorsements were hilariously un-influential. In the seven races, the only Times endorsed candidate who won was Alex Pedersen, and he had a real scare put into him by Shaun Scott.

As a progressive, I hope our 2021 election post-mortem doesn’t boil down to “the media was against us.” My reflection on the 2021 results is that 1) Jenny Durkan made a shrewd move by not seeking reelection, and; 2) homelessness and rising rates of violent crime were two of the most visible things that Seattle voters have encountered in the last two years, and the messages of the progressive candidates didn’t speak to the anxieties that people have about those things.

Last edited 16 days ago by Ben
Ben

Ugh, I noticed a sentence got cut off. I meant to say that in the 2015 city council races, the Times went 5/9 in their endorsements (the whole council was on the ballot). And in 2016 they were opposed to ST3.

A Joy

Seattle has never had a progressive media landscape, so one can’t be drying up. Outside of the US’s screwy Overton Window, media like The Stranger is moderate at best. A truly progressive media outlet can basically not survive in this country.