A recent poll of Seattle voters found strong support for pedestrianizing streets and adding protected bike lanes and bus lanes. Respondents highly rated the value of increasing street safety and make it easier to get around without a car. At a press conference held on a café street in Capitol Hill, Clara Cantor, an organizer for Seattle Neighborhood Greenways (SNG), called the results “affirming” and “encouraging” for the organization’s advocacy.

“I and many people envision a city where comfortable convenient bike routes connect every neighborhood in Seattle,” Cantor said. “And this vision is not only possible, it’s supported by 70% of Seattleites.”

Northwest Progressive Institute (NPI) commissioned the poll, which was completed by Change Research in mid-October. The batch of questions released yesterday, which were completed in partnership with SNG, gauged support for making streets safer and more comfortable for people of all ages and abilities to walk, bike, and roll by asking about both values and specific tactics to implement those values. The poll surveyed 617 online respondents and results were modeled margin of error of 4.1% at the 95% confidence interval, NPI said.

NPI founder Andrew Villeneuve said he intended to ensure the poll results, which arrive at a critical time for infrastructure planning as state and cities assemble plans for applying for federal grants funded by the newly passed Infrastructure and Jobs Act, are highlighted for Seattle City Council and other local decision makers.

Let’s dive a bit deeper into those striking poll results, which should be welcome news for urbanists.

(Credit: Northwest Progressive Institute)

In the first question, voters were ask to assess the importance of nine values: safety, accessibility, affordability, convenience, kid-friendly streets, racial equity, clean environment, health, and happiness. Not unsurprisingly, a strong majority of people either agreed or strongly agreed that the aforementioned values were important, with more than 90% of respondents in agreement about the importance of safety, accessibility, affordability, and convenience. Those values compose bedrock principles that inspire people to advocate for active transportation: walking, rolling, and biking. However, people who wish to continue prioritizing cars could — at least in theory — also respond that they consider those values as important.

Two young kids on trikes in an open street.
A “Stay Healthy” open street being put to good use by two young Seattleites. (Photo by SDOT)

Any confusion over the polled Seattle voters wishing to see streets made more convenient for cars was laid to rest, however, by the results from questions that followed, both of which addressed ideas for making streets more people-friendly.

(Credit: Northwest Progressive Institute)

Responses to the question above were much more surprising; as whole, more than seven out of ten of the polled Seattle voters were in favor of seeing all of the following changes adopted in their neighborhoods, even at the expense of a lane of traffic or parking spaces.

  • Safe walking and biking routes for kids, parents, and teachers to get to schools – A total of 84% of respondents supported safe routes to schools, with 56% indicating strong support.
  • More space for outdoor dining and retail to support small businesses – 84% of those polled also indicated support for outdoor dining and retail, with 55% indicating strong support.
  • Wider sidewalks and planting strips to give people more room to walk and plant more street trees – 78% of those polled supported wider sidewalks, 47% indicating strong support.
  • Dedicated bus lanes – 74% of respondents indicated support for giving buses their own lanes to speed up trips, 41% indicating strong support.
  • Protected bike lanes – 71% of those polled supported building bike lanes that are physically separate from cars, a strong showing of support for a measure that has attracted high profile controversy in the past, such as in the case of the proposed protected bike lanes on NE 35th Avenue, which were dropped to the great disappointment of advocates for safer biking streets. Demonstrating the somewhat polarizing nature of the topic, 46% of respondents indicated strong support for protected bike lanes, but 13% also indicated strong opposition — the only result to surpass 10%.

The next question related to changes that were connecting to helping Seattle achieve its climate, health, equity, livability, economic, and safety goals.

(Credit: Northwest Progressive Institute)

Once again, with one exception, all of the changes proposed received levels of supporting topping 50%, and the top three were all supported by more than 7 out of 10 Seattle voters polled. The one measure that received 45% support was for requiring Seattleites to pay for sidewalk repairs when they sell their properties. Currently Seattleites are responsible for repairing sidewalks adjacent to their properties, but this fact is not well known and there is not much support available to help them make repairs. The City has been exploring a policy implemented in Oakland that requires property owners to bring sidewalks into compliance before a property is sold and uses a revolving fund to assist lower income land owners with costs. SNG feels a better solution would be to pass progressive taxation to fully fund the city run sidewalk repair program, but until that occurs the organization hopes the Oakland inspired policy can offer a pragmatic and temporary solution.

The changes that received the highest degree support included providing for more homes, retail, and neighborhood amenities in order to make Seattle a city where people can walk to all their daily needs in fifteen minutes or less, limiting traffic to unloading and loading on certain shopping streets (Pike Place Market, for example), and shifting traffic enforcement from the Seattle Police Department (SPD) to the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) so that SPD can focus on other priorities.

Brie Gyncild of Central Seattle Greenways spoke with excitement about how many Seattleites expressed the desire to live in a 15-minute neighborhood where meeting basic needs like going shopping, taking children to school, or attending a medical appointment can all occur in a short walk or roll from home.

“This is a shared vision that we can use as we work to update our comprehensive plan because together we should ensure that every neighborhood in our city has the housing, the retail, the resources, and the other amenities that we all need to thrive,” Gyncild said. Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan Update is due in 2024, and some advocates have called the “most consequential” in the city’s history current given the housing crisis and urgent need for climate action. Decisions guiding that plan will be hashed out over the next couple years.

A protected bike lane on Roosevelt Way wraps behind the bus shelter, improving operations for both modes. (Photo by Doug Trumm)

Juan Jose Bocanegra, founder of El Centro de la Raza, expressed the need to continue to reimagine public safety by moving traffic enforcement away from SPD. “These results give our policy makers a great indication of what people of color have been telling them for decades, for centuries, about the use of police against us,” he said.

Other changes that poll respondents espoused support for included creating low-traffic, low-speed neighborhood streets where people can safely walk, bike, run, and play, as well as allowing schools to close adjacent streets during the school year to create a safer environment for kids to get to and from school.

As a whole, the poll results back up patterns of behavior that have been observed since the beginning of the Covid pandemic. People are continuing to embrace Stay Healthy streets and café streets, making it difficult to imagine reverting to pre-pandemic right of way uses on streets like Ballard Avenue, which have been utterly transformed. If anything, these poll results show that rather than return to the old ways, Seattleites are hungry to push these new paradigms further forward by implementing changes that will make streets safer, more comfortable, and more inviting to more people across the city.

We hope you loved this article. If so, please consider subscribing or donating. The Urbanist is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit that depends on donations from readers like you.

Natalie Bicknell Argerious (she/her) is Managing Editor at The Urbanist. A passionate urban explorer since childhood, she loves learning how to make cities more inclusive, vibrant, and environmentally resilient. You can often find her wandering around Seattle's Central District and Capitol Hill with her dogs and cat. Email her at natalie [at] theurbanist [dot] org.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anne

I have been wondering about the side walks: when a house is rebuild you see that sidewalks that were in place before are being restored but missing elements are not. These could be easy wins. Example: ramble on a corner is being replaced with a 1.5 miljon dollar mansion. Side walk in front of the house is patched but the connecting piece to the road is not build. It was not their previously but would be a simple win. This example is within 1 block from an elementary school.

RDPence

Has anybody everhad any luck getting Councilmember Sawant to work an issue that wasn’t in her party manifesto? An issue of interest or concern to constituents or a neighborhood in the 3rd District, but not in her little red playbook?

Douglas Trumm

This seems a non-sequitur as Sawant wasn’t even mentioned in this article. If you’re going to cast aspersions at least be specific. E.g., What issues and “little red playbook” are you referring to?